URT vs Tricordiano analysis
Possible results
Probability of each exact result
Probability of each margin of victory
51.2%
Win probability
1.78
Expected goals
8-0
<0%
+8
<0%
7-0
0.1%
8-1
<0%
+7
0.1%
6-0
0.2%
7-1
0.1%
+6
0.3%
5-0
0.8%
6-1
0.3%
7-2
<0%
+5
1.1%
4-0
2.1%
5-1
0.9%
6-2
0.2%
7-3
<0%
+4
3.2%
3-0
4.8%
4-1
2.6%
5-2
0.5%
6-3
0.1%
+3
8%
2-0
8.1%
3-1
5.7%
4-2
1.5%
5-3
0.2%
6-4
<0%
+2
15.6%
1-0
9.2%
2-1
9.7%
3-2
3.4%
4-3
0.6%
5-4
0.1%
+1
22.9%
23.3%
Draw
0-0
5.1%
1-1
10.9%
2-2
5.7%
3-3
1.3%
4-4
0.2%
5-5
<0%
0
23.3%
25.5%
Win probability
1.19
Expected goals
0-1
6.1%
1-2
6.5%
2-3
2.3%
3-4
0.4%
4-5
0%
-1
15.3%
0-2
3.6%
1-3
2.6%
2-4
0.7%
3-5
0.1%
-2
7%
0-3
1.4%
1-4
0.8%
2-5
0.2%
3-6
0%
-3
2.4%
0-4
0.4%
1-5
0.2%
2-6
0%
-4
0.6%
0-5
0.1%
1-6
0%
-5
0.1%
0-6
0%
-6
<0%
ELO Graph/Inclination
← Defensive
Tilt
Attacking →
ELO progression
Next opponents in ELO points
Matches
URT
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05 Mar. 2016 |
GUA
1 - 1
URT
40%
27%
33%
|
48 | 46 | 2 | 0 |
| 27 Feb. 2016 |
URT
1 - 0
ATM
10%
20%
71%
|
47 | 84 | 37 | +1 |
| 21 Feb. 2016 |
URT
1 - 1
TOM
34%
26%
40%
|
46 | 51 | 5 | +1 |
| 14 Feb. 2016 |
BOA
1 - 2
URT
65%
21%
14%
|
45 | 56 | 11 | +1 |
| 06 Feb. 2016 |
URT
0 - 1
VIL
62%
22%
16%
|
46 | 39 | 7 | -1 |
Matches
Tricordiano
|
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05 Mar. 2016 |
TRI
1 - 0
AMF
6%
14%
80%
|
43 | 71 | 28 | 0 |
| 02 Mar. 2016 |
TOM
3 - 1
TRI
53%
24%
23%
|
44 | 50 | 6 | -1 |
| 27 Feb. 2016 |
CAL
3 - 1
TRI
54%
24%
22%
|
44 | 51 | 7 | 0 |
| 20 Feb. 2016 |
TRI
0 - 1
CRZ
7%
17%
76%
|
45 | 84 | 39 | -1 |
| 09 Feb. 2016 |
TRI
3 - 0
GUA
27%
25%
48%
|
42 | 49 | 7 | +3 |