Panegialios vs OFI analysis
Possible results
![Panegialios](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/escudos/medium/12678.jpg?size=60x&lossy=1)
![OFI](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/escudos/medium/1845.jpg?size=60x&lossy=1)
ELO Graph/Inclination
![Panegialios](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/equipos/12678.png?size=60x&lossy=1)
![OFI](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/equipos/1845.png?size=60x&lossy=1)
ELO progression
![Panegialios](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/escudos/medium/12678.jpg?size=60x&lossy=1)
![OFI](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/escudos/medium/1845.jpg?size=60x&lossy=1)
Matches
![Panegialios](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/escudos/medium/12678.jpg?size=60x&lossy=1)
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 Mar. 2017 |
ACH
![]() 0 - 0
![]() PAN
31%
26%
42%
|
37 | 28 | 9 | 0 |
22 Mar. 2017 |
PAN
![]() 1 - 1
![]() PAN
57%
26%
17%
|
37 | 30 | 7 | 0 |
19 Mar. 2017 |
AGR
![]() 1 - 1
![]() PAN
45%
27%
28%
|
37 | 38 | 1 | 0 |
11 Mar. 2017 |
PAN
![]() 0 - 0
![]() APS
17%
26%
56%
|
36 | 48 | 12 | +1 |
05 Mar. 2017 |
PAN
![]() 2 - 0
![]() KAL
50%
26%
24%
|
35 | 30 | 5 | +1 |
Matches
![OFI](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/escudos/medium/1845.jpg?size=60x&lossy=1)
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 Mar. 2017 |
OFI
![]() 1 - 0
![]() KAL
83%
13%
5%
|
53 | 28 | 25 | 0 |
22 Mar. 2017 |
CHA
![]() 0 - 2
![]() OFI
12%
22%
66%
|
53 | 31 | 22 | 0 |
18 Mar. 2017 |
OFI
![]() 0 - 1
![]() TRI
72%
19%
10%
|
54 | 43 | 11 | -1 |
12 Mar. 2017 |
PAN
![]() 0 - 3
![]() OFI
11%
21%
69%
|
54 | 24 | 30 | 0 |
05 Mar. 2017 |
KAL
![]() 1 - 2
![]() OFI
19%
24%
57%
|
54 | 37 | 17 | 0 |