Green Boys vs Union Kayl-Tétange analysis

Green Boys Union Kayl-Tétange
37 ELO 48
6% Tilt 21.9%
24638º General ELO ranking 24630º
51º Country ELO ranking 43º
ELO win probability
23%
Green Boys
22%
Draw
55%
Union Kayl-Tétange

Possible results

Probability of each exact result
Probability of each margin of victory
23%
Win probability
Green Boys
1.19
Expected goals
6-0
<0%
+6
<0%
5-0
0.1%
6-1
<0%
+5
0.1%
4-0
0.4%
5-1
0.2%
6-2
<0%
+4
0.6%
3-0
1.2%
4-1
0.7%
5-2
0.2%
6-3
<0%
+3
2.1%
2-0
3.1%
3-1
2.4%
4-2
0.7%
5-3
0.1%
6-4
<0%
+2
6.2%
1-0
5.2%
2-1
6%
3-2
2.3%
4-3
0.4%
5-4
0.1%
+1
14%
22%
Draw
0-0
4.4%
1-1
10.1%
2-2
5.8%
3-3
1.5%
4-4
0.2%
5-5
<0%
0
22%
55%
Win probability
Union Kayl-Tétange
1.95
Expected goals
0-1
8.5%
1-2
9.8%
2-3
3.8%
3-4
0.7%
4-5
0.1%
-1
22.9%
0-2
8.3%
1-3
6.4%
2-4
1.8%
3-5
0.3%
4-6
0%
-2
16.7%
0-3
5.4%
1-4
3.1%
2-5
0.7%
3-6
0.1%
-3
9.2%
0-4
2.6%
1-5
1.2%
2-6
0.2%
3-7
0%
-4
4.1%
0-5
1%
1-6
0.4%
2-7
0.1%
-5
1.5%
0-6
0.3%
1-7
0.1%
2-8
0%
-6
0.5%
0-7
0.1%
1-8
0%
-7
0.1%
0-8
0%
-8
<0%

ELO Graph/Inclination

← Defensive Tilt Attacking →

ELO progression

Green Boys
Union Kayl-Tétange
Next opponents in ELO points

Matches

Green Boys
Green Boys
1%
X%
2%
ELO ELO Cont. ▵ELO ±ELO
10 Oct. 2010
YBD
Young Boys
6 - 1
Green Boys
GRE
58%
21%
21%
37 42 5 0
02 Oct. 2010
GRE
Green Boys
0 - 4
Mondercange
MON
45%
24%
31%
39 42 3 -2
25 Sep. 2010
USM
US Mondorf les Bains
2 - 2
Green Boys
GRE
63%
20%
17%
39 47 8 0
19 Sep. 2010
GRE
Green Boys
0 - 5
Erpeldange
ERP
28%
24%
48%
40 51 11 -1
15 Sep. 2010
GRE
Green Boys
1 - 2
Rumelange
RUM
34%
23%
43%
41 46 5 -1

Matches

Union Kayl-Tétange
Union Kayl-Tétange
1%
X%
2%
ELO ELO Cont. ▵ELO ±ELO
10 Oct. 2010
VIC
Victoria Rosport
1 - 2
Union Kayl-Tétange
UKT
60%
20%
20%
48 52 4 0
02 Oct. 2010
UKT
Union Kayl-Tétange
3 - 1
Young Boys
YBD
60%
21%
20%
47 43 4 +1
26 Sep. 2010
MON
Mondercange
1 - 4
Union Kayl-Tétange
UKT
49%
22%
29%
46 44 2 +1
19 Sep. 2010
UKT
Union Kayl-Tétange
2 - 4
US Mondorf les Bains
USM
56%
23%
22%
47 46 1 -1
12 Sep. 2010
ERP
Erpeldange
5 - 3
Union Kayl-Tétange
UKT
56%
22%
22%
48 51 3 -1