Caen II vs QRM II analysis
Possible results
![Caen II](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/escudos/medium/6701.jpg?size=60x&lossy=1)
![QRM II](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/escudos/medium/11852.jpg?size=60x&lossy=1)
ELO Graph/Inclination
![Caen II](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/equipos/6701.png?size=60x&lossy=1)
![QRM II](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/equipos/11852.png?size=60x&lossy=1)
ELO progression
![Caen II](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/escudos/medium/6701.jpg?size=60x&lossy=1)
![QRM II](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/escudos/medium/11852.jpg?size=60x&lossy=1)
Matches
![Caen II](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/escudos/medium/6701.jpg?size=60x&lossy=1)
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
27 Aug. 2016 |
EVR
![]() 0 - 1
![]() CAE
39%
24%
37%
|
35 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
20 Aug. 2016 |
UJA
![]() 3 - 0
![]() CAE
23%
24%
53%
|
37 | 28 | 9 | -2 |
04 Jun. 2016 |
CAE
![]() 3 - 3
![]() SEN
65%
20%
15%
|
36 | 31 | 5 | +1 |
28 May. 2016 |
LEH
![]() 3 - 3
![]() CAE
60%
23%
18%
|
36 | 43 | 7 | 0 |
15 May. 2016 |
CAE
![]() 2 - 2
![]() CAE
75%
15%
10%
|
36 | 24 | 12 | 0 |
Matches
![QRM II](https://cdn.resfu.com/img_data/escudos/medium/11852.jpg?size=60x&lossy=1)
1%
X%
2%
|
ELO | ELO Cont. | ▵ELO | ±ELO | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
27 Aug. 2016 |
QUE
![]() 1 - 1
![]() UJA
63%
18%
19%
|
34 | 32 | 2 | 0 |
20 Aug. 2016 |
DRO
![]() 0 - 0
![]() QUE
50%
22%
28%
|
34 | 35 | 1 | 0 |
23 May. 2015 |
QUE
![]() 2 - 4
![]() SAI
62%
19%
19%
|
34 | 31 | 3 | 0 |
16 May. 2015 |
BAS
![]() 2 - 0
![]() QUE
41%
24%
35%
|
35 | 33 | 2 | -1 |
03 May. 2015 |
QUE
![]() 4 - 1
![]() STG
51%
22%
27%
|
34 | 36 | 2 | +1 |